Reviews of the EMS and EnMS by management follow a written process at planned intervals, at least yearly and after significant change, judging adequacy, effectiveness and fit with the Policy, objectives, Statement, compliance duties and business processes. Inputs include whether the Policy and Statement still align, how targets are being met, what audits and compliance checks found, what stakeholders said, the risks and opportunities, and where corrective and preventive work stands; outputs record decisions on improvement, resources, changes to objectives or processes and better integration with the business, and records are kept for at least three years.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.