Previously developed hardware use is stated in the PHAC with CM and process assurance addressed. Modifications (from requirement changes, errors found, enhancements, procurement problems) are analysed by reviewing the system safety assessment outputs, applying 11.1.4 if the assurance level rises, and analysing the impact of the change including re-verification beyond the changed area, determined by signal flow, functional, timing or traceability analysis.
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.