The governing body keeps examining and evaluating what stakeholder engagement and reporting will be needed now and in future, reporting required by regulation included, and communication to other stakeholders, and it sets principles for how stakeholders are engaged and communicated with. Every relevant I&T stakeholder inside and outside the enterprise is identified and placed in groups that share similar requirements. Present and upcoming obligations to report on how I&T is used (from regulation, legislation, common law or contract), external audit and assurance among them, are examined and judged. What other stakeholders need in communication and reporting, including how involved they need to be and what information they must be able to access, is examined and judged. Principles for communicating with internal and external stakeholders are kept up, covering formats and channels and how stakeholders accept and sign off reports.
This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.