Present availability, performance and capacity are assessed and a baseline is set: the review of services and resources takes into account customer requirements now and forecast, business priorities and objectives, budget, how resources are used, IT capabilities and trends in the industry; every incident that stems from insufficient performance or capacity is identified and pursued; actual performance and capacity use are tracked against set thresholds, using automated tools where needed; and the present levels at each processing layer (capacity of resources, capacity of services, and business demand) are evaluated regularly against trends and service level agreements, allowing for changes in the environment.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.