CMMC 2.0 CM.L2-3.4.4: Security Impact Analysis

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 42 controls across 22 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 5 controls

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-04 The estimated impact and scope of adverse events are understood
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-04 Potential impacts and likelihoods of threats exploiting vulnerabilities are identified and recorded
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-07 Changes and exceptions are managed, assessed for risk impact, recorded, and tracked
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01 Configuration management practices are established and applied
NIST-CSF-RS.AN-08 An incident's magnitude is estimated and validated

PCI DSS 4.0 · 5 controls

1.2.2 1.2.2 Network connection and NSC changes under change control
11.3.1.3 11.3.1.3 Internal scans after significant change
12.5.3 12.5.3 Scope review after significant organisational change
6.5.1 6.5.1 Change control procedure for production
6.5.2 6.5.2 Confirm PCI DSS controls after significant change

ISO 27001:2022 · 4 controls

5.8 Information security in project management
8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles
8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance
8.32 Change management

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 3 controls

SEC01-BP07 Identify threats and prioritize mitigations using a threat model
SEC11-BP02 Automate testing throughout the development and release lifecycle
SEC11-BP04 Conduct code reviews

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

C5-DEV-05 Risk assessment, categorisation and prioritisation of changes
C5-DEV-06 Testing changes

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

CM-4 Impact Analyses
CM-4(2) Impact Analyses | Verification of Controls (CM-4(2))

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

CM-4 Impact Analyses
CM-4(2) Impact Analyses | Verification of Controls (CM-4(2))

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

8.26 Application security requirements
8.32 Change management

ISO 27701:2019 · 2 controls

6.11.2 Security in development and support processes
7.2.5 Privacy impact assessment

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 2 controls

6.1.2 AI risk assessment
8.2 AI risk assessment

SOC 2 · 2 controls

SOC2-CC3.4 CC3.4 Identifying and assessing significant changes (COSO principle 9)
SOC2-CC8.1 CC8.1 Managing changes to procedures, software, data and infrastructure

APRA CPS 234 · 1 control

CPS234-P31 Annual Review of Testing Program Sufficiency

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

CFTC-SS-32 Timely Advance Notice of Material Planned Changes

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

CIS-4.2 Establish and Maintain a Secure Configuration Process for Network Infrastructure

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-CCC-02 Quality Testing

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) Risk Analysis (Required)

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

Art.21.2.e Security in acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling and disclosure

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-CM-4 Impact Analysis

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.04.04 Impact Analyses

NIST SP 800-218 · 1 control

SP800-218-PW.2.1 Qualified Review of Software Design

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-CM-4 CM-4 Impact Analyses

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) Risk Analysis (Required)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of CMMC 2.0 have you already done?

CMMC 2.0 CM.L2-3.4.4 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of CMMC 2.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold FedRAMP Moderate and 108 of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold FedRAMP Moderate98.2% covered · 2 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 394.5% covered · 6 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 585.5% covered · 16 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202279.1% covered · 23 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202267.3% covered · 36 gaps If you hold CIS Controls v864.5% covered · 39 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 1 were rejected on the FedRAMP Moderate pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free