FedRAMP High
CM - Configuration Management

FedRAMP High CM-4(2): Impact Analyses | Verification of Controls. After system changes, verify that the impacted controls are implemented correctly, operating as intended, and producing the desired outcome with regard to meeting the security and privacy requirements

Impact Analyses | Verification of Controls. After system changes, verify that the impacted controls are implemented correctly, operating as intended, and producing the desired outcome with regard to meeting the security and privacy requirements

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 18 controls across 14 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

  • CIS-16.8 Separate Production and Non-Production Systems
  • CIS-18.4 Validate Security Measures

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 8.31 Separation of development, test and production environments
  • 8.32 Change management

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 8.31 Separation of development, test and production environments
  • 8.32 Change management
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-07 Changes and exceptions are managed, assessed for risk impact, recorded, and tracked
  • NIST-CSF-PR.PS-06 Secure software development practices are integrated, and their performance is monitored throughout the software development life cycle
  • SEC01-BP06 Automate deployment of standard security controls
  • PV-2 Audit and enforce secure configurations

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

ISO 22000:2018 · 1 control

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

  • 3.14.7e Verify Correctness of Security Functions

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 6.5.2 Upon completion of a significant change, all applicable PCI DSS requirements are confirmed to be in place on all new or changed systems and networks, and documentation is updated as applicable

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-CC8.1 Change management processes are in place

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in CM - Configuration Management

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High CM-4(2) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 18 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.