C5 (Germany)
C5: Physical Security

C5 (Germany) C5-PS-06: Protection against interruptions caused by power failures and other such risks

Document and install supply resilience for production systems, covering N+1 power and cooling, correctly sized UPS and emergency generators tested at least annually, manufacturer aligned maintenance, and protection of power and telecommunications cabling inspected at least every two years.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 22 controls across 11 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

FedRAMP High · 3 controls

  • PE-10 Emergency Shutoff (PE-10)
  • PE-11 Emergency Power (PE-11)
  • PE-9 Power Equipment and Cabling (PE-9)

FedRAMP Moderate · 3 controls

  • PE-10 Emergency Shutoff (PE-10)
  • PE-11 Emergency Power (PE-11)
  • PE-9 Power Equipment and Cabling (PE-9)

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 3 controls

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 7.11 Supporting utilities
  • 7.5 Protecting against physical and environmental threats

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 7.11 Supporting utilities
  • 7.5 Protecting against physical and environmental threats
  • CFTC-SS-6 Physical Security and Environmental Controls Category

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

  • NIST-CSF-PR.IR-02 The organization's technology assets are protected from environmental threats

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-A1.2 A1.2 Environmental protection, backup and recovery infrastructure

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in C5: Physical Security

You are reading one control. How much of C5 (Germany) have you already done?

C5 (Germany) C5-PS-06 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of C5 (Germany) your existing evidence covers. Hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and 95 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 22 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.