The people who determine results are competent, work in conditions and with equipment suited to interpretation, and have evidence-based reference intervals and evidence-based clinical decision limits (thresholds drawn from guidelines, peer-reviewed literature, professional bodies or validated outcome studies, which may differ from population reference intervals). Results are correct, checked against internal controls, timely, unambiguous, clinically meaningful and traceable to the request; a report for a test whose clinical validity is not established says so; and critical result thresholds and the escalation steps are written down.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.