For every testing area the practice writes down what analytical and clinical performance it demands. For quantitative work the key indicators cover at least how accurate and how precise the assay is, how little it can detect, what units results are reported in, and which common interferences affect it; qualitative work has its own set of indicators.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.