What does S3-2 require?

Schedule 3 adds to Part 2 for operators seeking mass alternative compliance accreditation against the prescribed operations requirements in section 5H of the Heavy Vehicle (Mass, Dimension and Loading) National Regulation; the Regulator can grant it only where the SMS meets Part 2 and this Schedule. Sound mass management rests on clear allocation of authority across every function that affects how vehicles are loaded and run: the operator identifies the positions that manage and verify mass activities and assigns responsibility deliberately, on an informed understanding of how loading actually happens. Four things are looked for: mass management responsibilities are clearly allocated across management, operation and verification; leadership can see mass-related risks, such as overload incidents or equipment failure, well enough to oversee the system's effectiveness; the allocated responsibilities are visibly exercised in practice, with governance-level sight of compliance outcomes; and leadership keeps watch on workforce capability so that people with mass-related tasks understand and apply the systems of work correctly.

Australia Heavy Vehicle National Law Safety Management...

Other controls in Schedule 3 Alternative compliance accreditation, mass (requirements 2 to 9) – Australia Heavy Vehicle National Law Safety Management System Standard 2026

S3-3 ACA mass, vehicle identification and capability: all vehicles and trailers under the accreditation identifiable at any time, current documented details including subcontractor vehicles sufficient for audit, information showing identity, configuration and applicability of mass concessions or authorisations, vehicles demonstrably capable of operating within axle and gross mass limits, current network access authorisations, and controls securing subcontractor vehicles to the operator's accreditation
S3-4 ACA mass, vehicle use: mass determined before departure by a method giving objective assurance of compliance with axle and gross mass limits, loading decisions based on defined repeatable methods rather than estimates, foreseeable variation in density, volume, quantity and distribution accounted for, no trip commencing until compliance is confirmed, and records of suspension-related regulatory non-conformance
S3-5 ACA mass, suspension maintenance: suspension systems on all relevant vehicles including trailers and third-party vehicles maintained to appropriate technical standards and specifications, suspension faults identified, reported, prioritised and repaired to manage mass risk, work by suitably qualified or supervised persons, oversight and sign-off of maintenance decisions, and evidence that third-party vehicles meet the standard before operating under the accreditation
S3-6 ACA mass, verification: the accuracy of mass assessment methods periodically confirmed against certified or calibrated means producing auditable evidence, or, where periodic re-weighing is not relied on, demonstration that loading controls consistently ensure axle and gross mass compliance for every load and trip, with verification sufficient for confidence in the mass management system
S3-7 ACA mass, training and competence: persons with mass responsibilities understand the policies, procedures and instructions for their roles and why they exist, training appropriate to responsibilities and mass risks, evidence that training was delivered and competence maintained as systems or conditions change, and training that supports consistent application of mass controls
S3-8 ACA mass, review and continuous improvement: monitoring of weighbridge, onboard scale and load plan variance data to confirm consistent control, pattern detection prompting changes to loading instructions or calibration, corrective action at underlying causes rather than blaming loaders, reviews at intervals appropriate to risk and scale including quarterly oversight and annual assessment, demonstrated effectiveness of changes, and documented communicated procedure changes
S3-9 ACA mass, evidence: trip logs, weighbridge dockets or load plans credibly reflecting actual mass determinations and showing compliance for trips above general mass limits, evidence identifying the vehicles and the mass determination method per trip, current information on vehicles and personnel with mass responsibilities (integrable with existing records), evidence of action on mass defects and infringements, and documentation accessible and understandable to those who need it

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpoint All Australia Heavy Vehicle National Law Safety Management System Standard 2026 controls