Where it would be unlawful to discriminate in doing an act under Division 1 or 2, a person must not request or require information (by form or otherwise) in connection with that act if people without the disability would not be asked for it or the information relates to the disability, unless evidence shows, unrebutted, that none of the purposes was unlawful discrimination. Information may be sought, for example, to assess inherent requirements or to decide what reasonable adjustments to make, and evidence that an animal is an assistance animal may be requested (s 54A(5)).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.