APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
Controls

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management CPS230-P30: Monitoring, Review and Testing of Control Effectiveness

The entity must regularly monitor, review and test controls for design and operating effectiveness at a frequency proportionate to the materiality of the risks controlled, report results to senior management, and rectify any gaps or deficiencies in the control environment promptly.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 49 controls across 20 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

APRA CPS 234 · 4 controls

  • CPS234-22 Systematic Control Testing Program
  • CPS234-28 Escalation of Unremediated Testing Deficiencies
  • CPS234-P30 Independence and Skill of Testing Personnel
  • CPS234-P31 Annual Review of Testing Program Sufficiency

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

C5 (Germany) · 3 controls

  • C5-COM-02 Policy for planning and conducting audits
  • C5-COM-03 Internal audits of the information security management system
  • C5-OPS-20 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Measurements, Analyses and Assessments of Procedures

FedRAMP High · 3 controls

  • AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
  • CA-2 Control Assessments
  • CA-7 Continuous Monitoring

FedRAMP Moderate · 3 controls

  • AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
  • CA-2 Control Assessments
  • CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
  • NIST-CSF-GV.OV-03 Organizational cybersecurity risk management performance is evaluated and reviewed for adjustments needed
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-02 Improvements are identified from security tests and exercises, including those done in coordination with suppliers and relevant third parties
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-08 Processes for receiving, analyzing, and responding to vulnerability disclosures are established

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 3 controls

  • PV-2 Audit and enforce secure configurations
  • PV-5 Perform vulnerability assessments
  • CFTC-SS-15 Controls Testing
  • CFTC-SS-36 Internal Reporting and Review by Senior Management and the Board

CMMC 2.0 · 2 controls

DORA · 2 controls

HIPAA Security Rule · 2 controls

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.35 Independent review of information security
  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.35 Independent review of information security
  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 2 controls

SOC 2 · 2 controls

  • SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)
  • SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)
  • ANSSI-HYG-38 Carry Out Regular Security Checks and Audits and Apply the Corrective Actions

ISO 22301:2019 · 1 control

  • 9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Controls

You are reading one control. How much of APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management have you already done?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management CPS230-P30 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and 30 of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 4 were rejected on the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 49 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.