An employer relying on the defence to a s 35 charge must prove that the covert surveillance was conducted solely to secure the workplace or people in it, with surveillance of a worker incidental to that; that a real and significant risk existed that security would be compromised without it; and that workers, or a representative body covering a substantial share of them, received written notice of the planned security surveillance before it began. The defendant bears the legal burden. A covert record from such surveillance is admissible against a worker only in disciplinary or legal proceedings about workplace security, or in legal proceedings where the desirability of admitting it outweighs the undesirability of how it was obtained.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.