UK Cyber Essentials covers 9.3% of FedRAMP Moderate
30 of the 323 controls in FedRAMP Moderate are already satisfied by evidence you collected for UK Cyber Essentials. 293 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your UK Cyber Essentials evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
72 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Both require privileged accounts approved and tracked across their life.
Both require accounts disabled or removed when they are no longer required.
Both require account creation approved by an authorised individual before it exists.
Both require accounts disabled within a defined timeframe on leaver or role change.
Both require a unique account per user, restricting use of shared credentials.
Both require the system to grant only the privileges that were approved.
Both require the system to authenticate the account before access is enforced.
Both require periodic review and removal of privileges no longer justified.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk