SOC 2PCI DSS 4.0

SOC 2 covers 16.1% of PCI DSS 4.0

40 of the 249 controls in PCI DSS 4.0 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for SOC 2. 209 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

16.1%
of the target already covered
40
controls evidenced
209
genuine gaps
605
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your SOC 2 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

753 candidate mappings were examined and 620 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

Req 7: Restrict Access by Need to Know5 of 12 evidenced, 7 to do
Req 9: Restrict Physical Access7 of 26 evidenced, 19 to do
Req 5: Anti-Malware3 of 13 evidenced, 10 to do
Req 12: Information Security Policies8 of 37 evidenced, 29 to do
Req 1: Network Security Controls4 of 19 evidenced, 15 to do
Req 4: Protect Cardholder Data in Transit1 of 6 evidenced, 5 to do
Req 8: Identify and Authenticate Users4 of 29 evidenced, 25 to do
Req 10: Logging and Monitoring3 of 27 evidenced, 24 to do
Req 6: Secure Systems and Software2 of 19 evidenced, 17 to do
Req 11: Test Security Regularly2 of 21 evidenced, 19 to do
Req 3: Protect Stored Account Data1 of 29 evidenced, 28 to do
Req 2: Secure Configurations0 of 11 evidenced, 11 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

SOC2-CC8.11.2.2argued against and upheld
Changes to NSC reviewed and approved

Changes are authorized, documented, tested and approved before implementation, including network controls.

SOC2-CC6.61.3.1argued against and upheld
Inbound traffic to CDE restricted

Logical access measures against threats outside system boundaries restrict inbound traffic to the environment.

SOC2-CC6.61.3.2argued against and upheld
Outbound traffic from CDE restricted

Boundary measures control traffic leaving the protected environment as well as entering it.

SOC2-CC6.61.4.1argued against and upheld
NSCs between trusted and untrusted networks

Controls between the system boundary and untrusted networks are the measure this requirement demands.

SOC2-CC7.210.2.1argued against and upheld
Audit logs enabled on system components

Monitoring system components for anomalies requires audit logs enabled across components.

SOC2-CC7.210.4.1argued against and upheld
Daily log review for critical systems

Components and their operation are monitored for anomalies, which is the daily review of critical logs.

SOC2-CC7.210.4.3argued against and upheld
Exceptions and anomalies addressed

Anomalies are analyzed to determine whether they indicate malicious acts and are acted upon.

SOC2-CC7.111.3.1argued against and upheld
Internal vulnerability scans quarterly

Detection procedures identify susceptibility to newly discovered vulnerabilities across internal systems.

Claims that did not hold

605 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.

SOC2-CC1.51.1.2
Roles and responsibilities for Requirement 1

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

SOC2-CC2.21.1.2
Roles and responsibilities for Requirement 1

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

SOC2-CC8.11.2.1
NSC configuration standards defined

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

SOC2-CC5.31.2.1
NSC configuration standards defined

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

SOC2-CC6.11.2.1
NSC configuration standards defined

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

SOC2-CC8.11.2.8
Configuration files secured and synchronised

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

SOC2-CC6.11.2.8
Configuration files secured and synchronised

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

SOC2-CC7.110.2.1.4
Log invalid logical access attempts

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk