NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 covers 41.7% of Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)

10 of the 24 controls in Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) are already satisfied by evidence you collected for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. 14 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

41.7%
of the target already covered
10
controls evidenced
14
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) your NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

29 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

Information Security (Schedule 2)9 of 11 evidenced, 2 to do
Privacy Safeguards1 of 13 evidenced, 12 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

03.05.03AUCDR-IS-1argued against and upheld
Limit risk of unauthorised access to the CDR data environment

Multi-factor authentication is required for privileged and non-privileged account access.

03.05.01AUCDR-IS-1argued against and upheld
Limit risk of unauthorised access to the CDR data environment

Unique identification and authentication of every user before access is granted.

03.03.05AUCDR-IS-1argued against and upheld
Limit risk of unauthorised access to the CDR data environment

Audit records are reviewed and analysed for indicators of inappropriate activity.

03.01.06AUCDR-IS-1argued against and upheld
Limit risk of unauthorised access to the CDR data environment

Privileged accounts are restricted to designated personnel with separate non-privileged use.

03.13.11AUCDR-IS-2argued against and upheld
Secure the network and systems within the data environment

FIPS validated cryptography protects the confidentiality of the data held.

03.13.01AUCDR-IS-2argued against and upheld
Secure the network and systems within the data environment

Boundary protection controls communications through managed interfaces and subnetworks.

03.04.02AUCDR-IS-2argued against and upheld
Secure the network and systems within the data environment

Configuration settings in the most restrictive mode is server and device hardening.

03.14.01AUCDR-IS-4argued against and upheld
Formal vulnerability management program

Flaws are identified, reported and corrected with updates installed within set periods.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk