ISO 27002:2022FedRAMP Moderate

ISO 27002:2022 covers 56.3% of FedRAMP Moderate

182 of the 323 controls in FedRAMP Moderate are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ISO 27002:2022. 141 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

56.3%

of the target already covered

182

controls evidenced

141

genuine gaps

290

claims rejected in review

What this leaves you to do

FedRAMP Moderate has 323 controls. Holding ISO 27002:2022 already evidences 182 of them, so the work in front of you is 141 controls, not 323, which is 44% of the standard rather than all of it.

That is the whole claim. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.

In money, using only our numbers. The full report is $299 and names 182 controls of FedRAMP Moderate you do not have to implement again, which is $1.64 per control identified. That arithmetic uses our price and our count and assumes nothing about you.

In your hours, using your assumption. We do not know what a control costs you to implement, so pick the column that looks like your organisation. These are your figures, not our claim.

If a control takes you	4 hours	8 hours	16 hours
the 182 already evidenced are	728 hours	1,456 hours	2,912 hours
and the 141 remaining are	564 hours	1,128 hours	2,256 hours

Multiply by your own rate. We publish no rate because we have not measured yours, and a number built on an invented rate is the kind of claim this platform exists to argue against.

This number is directional. It says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your ISO 27002:2022 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

684 candidate mappings were examined and 348 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

PE - Physical and Environmental Protection16 of 19 evidenced, 3 to do

CM - Configuration Management20 of 27 evidenced, 7 to do

MP - Media Protection5 of 7 evidenced, 2 to do

PS - Personnel Security7 of 10 evidenced, 3 to do

SA - System and Services Acquisition14 of 21 evidenced, 7 to do

AC - Access Control26 of 43 evidenced, 17 to do

MA - Maintenance6 of 10 evidenced, 4 to do

IR - Incident Response10 of 17 evidenced, 7 to do

CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring8 of 14 evidenced, 6 to do

AU - Audit and Accountability9 of 16 evidenced, 7 to do

CP - Contingency Planning12 of 23 evidenced, 11 to do

SR - Supply Chain Risk Management6 of 12 evidenced, 6 to do

AT - Awareness and Training3 of 6 evidenced, 3 to do

RA - Risk Assessment5 of 11 evidenced, 6 to do

SC - System and Communications Protection13 of 29 evidenced, 16 to do

PL - Planning3 of 7 evidenced, 4 to do

SI - System and Information Integrity10 of 24 evidenced, 14 to do

IA - Identification and Authentication9 of 27 evidenced, 18 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

5.15AC-1argued against and upheld

Policy and Procedures

Requires an access control policy based on business and security requirements.

7.7AC-11argued against and upheld

Device Lock

Clear screen rules require sessions be locked when devices are unattended.

7.7AC-11(1)argued against and upheld

Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information previously visible on the display with a publicly viewable image

Clear screen rules require displayed information be concealed on lock.

6.7AC-17argued against and upheld

Remote Access

Requires security measures for personnel accessing systems from outside the premises.

6.7AC-17(1)argued against and upheld

Monitoring and Control

Remote working measures must include monitoring and control of remote connections.

6.7AC-17(3)argued against and upheld

Managed Access Control Points

Remote access must be routed through defined managed access points.

8.21AC-18argued against and upheld

Wireless Access

Security mechanisms and requirements for wireless network services must be defined.

7.9AC-19argued against and upheld

Access Control for Mobile Devices

Assets used outside the premises require protection appropriate to the risk.

Claims that did not hold

290 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.

8.5AC-11

Device Lock