ISO 27002:2022FedRAMP Moderate

ISO 27002:2022 covers 56.3% of FedRAMP Moderate

182 of the 323 controls in FedRAMP Moderate are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ISO 27002:2022. 141 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

56.3%
of the target already covered
182
controls evidenced
141
genuine gaps
290
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your ISO 27002:2022 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

684 candidate mappings were examined and 348 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

PE - Physical and Environmental Protection16 of 19 evidenced, 3 to do
CM - Configuration Management20 of 27 evidenced, 7 to do
MP - Media Protection5 of 7 evidenced, 2 to do
PS - Personnel Security7 of 10 evidenced, 3 to do
SA - System and Services Acquisition14 of 21 evidenced, 7 to do
AC - Access Control26 of 43 evidenced, 17 to do
MA - Maintenance6 of 10 evidenced, 4 to do
IR - Incident Response10 of 17 evidenced, 7 to do
CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring8 of 14 evidenced, 6 to do
AU - Audit and Accountability9 of 16 evidenced, 7 to do
CP - Contingency Planning12 of 23 evidenced, 11 to do
SR - Supply Chain Risk Management6 of 12 evidenced, 6 to do
AT - Awareness and Training3 of 6 evidenced, 3 to do
RA - Risk Assessment5 of 11 evidenced, 6 to do
SC - System and Communications Protection13 of 29 evidenced, 16 to do
PL - Planning3 of 7 evidenced, 4 to do
SI - System and Information Integrity10 of 24 evidenced, 14 to do
IA - Identification and Authentication9 of 27 evidenced, 18 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

5.15AC-1argued against and upheld
Policy and Procedures

Requires an access control policy based on business and security requirements.

7.7AC-11argued against and upheld
Device Lock

Clear screen rules require sessions be locked when devices are unattended.

7.7AC-11(1)argued against and upheld
Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information previously visible on the display with a publicly viewable image

Clear screen rules require displayed information be concealed on lock.

6.7AC-17argued against and upheld
Remote Access

Requires security measures for personnel accessing systems from outside the premises.

6.7AC-17(1)argued against and upheld
Monitoring and Control

Remote working measures must include monitoring and control of remote connections.

6.7AC-17(3)argued against and upheld
Managed Access Control Points

Remote access must be routed through defined managed access points.

8.21AC-18argued against and upheld
Wireless Access

Security mechanisms and requirements for wireless network services must be defined.

7.9AC-19argued against and upheld
Access Control for Mobile Devices

Assets used outside the premises require protection appropriate to the risk.

Claims that did not hold

290 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.

8.5AC-11
Device Lock

Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

8.1AC-11(1)
Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information previously visible on the display with a publicly viewable image

Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

8.5AC-12
Session Termination

Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

8.5AC-17(4)
Privileged Commands and Access

Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

8.18AC-17(4)
Privileged Commands and Access

Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

8.24AC-19(5)
Full Device or Container-Based Encryption

Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

5.16AC-2
Account Management

Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

8.3AC-2
Account Management

Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk