ISO 27002:2022 covers 56.3% of FedRAMP Moderate
182 of the 323 controls in FedRAMP Moderate are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ISO 27002:2022. 141 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your ISO 27002:2022 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
684 candidate mappings were examined and 348 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Requires an access control policy based on business and security requirements.
Clear screen rules require sessions be locked when devices are unattended.
Clear screen rules require displayed information be concealed on lock.
Requires security measures for personnel accessing systems from outside the premises.
Remote working measures must include monitoring and control of remote connections.
Remote access must be routed through defined managed access points.
Security mechanisms and requirements for wireless network services must be defined.
Assets used outside the premises require protection appropriate to the risk.
Claims that did not hold
290 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.
Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.
Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.
Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
Superseded by the Claude Code judgement pass for this pair on 2026-08-19.
Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk