ISO 27002:2022CMMC 2.0

ISO 27002:2022 covers 67.3% of CMMC 2.0

74 of the 110 controls in CMMC 2.0 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ISO 27002:2022. 36 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

67.3%
of the target already covered
74
controls evidenced
36
genuine gaps
26
claims rejected in review

What this leaves you to do

CMMC 2.0 has 110 controls. Holding ISO 27002:2022 already evidences 74 of them, so the work in front of you is 36 controls, not 110, which is 33% of the standard rather than all of it.

That is the whole claim. We do not know your hourly rate, how long a control takes you, or how many people you have, so there is no figure here in dollars or weeks. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.

This number is directional. It says how much of CMMC 2.0 your ISO 27002:2022 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

145 candidate mappings were examined and 28 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

Incident Response3 of 3 evidenced
Personnel Security2 of 2 evidenced
Configuration Management8 of 9 evidenced, 1 to do
System and Information Integrity6 of 7 evidenced, 1 to do
Physical Protection5 of 6 evidenced, 1 to do
Security Assessment3 of 4 evidenced, 1 to do
Audit and Accountability6 of 9 evidenced, 3 to do
Maintenance4 of 6 evidenced, 2 to do
Awareness and Training2 of 3 evidenced, 1 to do
Risk Assessment2 of 3 evidenced, 1 to do
Access Control14 of 22 evidenced, 8 to do
Identification and Authentication7 of 11 evidenced, 4 to do
Media Protection5 of 9 evidenced, 4 to do
System and Communications Protection7 of 16 evidenced, 9 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

5.15AC.L2-3.1.1argued against and upheld
Authorized Access Control

Access control policy restricting access to authorized users is the same requirement.

7.7AC.L2-3.1.10argued against and upheld
Session Lock

Clear screen requires session locking with concealed display after inactivity.

6.7AC.L2-3.1.12argued against and upheld
Control Remote Access

Remote working requires remote access to be authorised, controlled and monitored.

6.7AC.L2-3.1.13argued against and upheld
Remote Access Confidentiality

Remote working requires encrypted connections such as a VPN for remote sessions.

8.21AC.L2-3.1.17argued against and upheld
Wireless Access Protection

Network service security requires authentication and encryption mechanisms for services.

8.1AC.L2-3.1.18argued against and upheld
Mobile Device Connection

User endpoint device control governs how mobile devices may connect.

8.1AC.L2-3.1.19argued against and upheld
Encrypt CUI on Mobile

Endpoint device control requires encryption of information held on mobile devices.

8.3AC.L2-3.1.2argued against and upheld
Transaction & Function Control

Information access restriction covers which functions and transactions a user may run.

Claims that did not hold

26 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.

8.20AC.L2-3.1.12
Control Remote Access

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

8.5AC.L2-3.1.12
Control Remote Access

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

8.16AU.L2-3.3.3
Event Review

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

5.25AU.L2-3.3.3
Event Review

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

8.15AU.L2-3.3.5
Audit Correlation

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

8.19CM.L2-3.4.6
Least Functionality

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

7.4PE.L2-3.10.4
Physical Access Logs

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

8.7SC.L2-3.13.13
Mobile Code

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk