TheArtOfService
ISO 27002:2022C5 (Germany)

ISO 27002:2022 covers 67.8% of C5 (Germany)

82 of the 121 controls in C5 (Germany) are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ISO 27002:2022. 39 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

67.8%
of the target already covered
82
controls evidenced
39
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of C5 (Germany) your ISO 27002:2022 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

151 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

C5: Identity and Access Management8 of 9 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Communication Security7 of 8 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Physical Security6 of 7 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Asset Management5 of 6 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Human Resources5 of 6 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Procurement, Development and Modification of Information Systems8 of 10 evidenced, 2 to do
C5: Security Incident Management4 of 5 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Control and Monitoring of Service Providers and Suppliers4 of 5 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Business Continuity Management3 of 4 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Compliance3 of 4 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Cryptography and Key Management3 of 4 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Security Policies and Instructions2 of 3 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Operations15 of 24 evidenced, 9 to do
C5: Organisation of Information Security3 of 7 evidenced, 4 to do
C5: Product Safety and Security5 of 12 evidenced, 7 to do
C5: Portability and Interoperability1 of 3 evidenced, 2 to do
C5: Dealing with Investigation Requests from Government Agencies0 of 4 evidenced, 4 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

5.9C5-AM-01argued against and upheld
Asset Inventory

Asset inventory maintained through lifecycle is exactly the inventory control.

5.10C5-AM-02argued against and upheld
Acceptable Use and Safe Handling of Assets Policy

Acceptable use and safe handling rules for assets are documented and issued.

7.14C5-AM-04argued against and upheld
Decommissioning of Hardware

Secure disposal or re-use of equipment governs hardware withdrawal from production.

5.11C5-AM-05argued against and upheld
Commitment to Permissible Use, Safe Handling and Return of Assets

Return of assets on termination is the same obligation.

6.2C5-AM-05argued against and upheld
Commitment to Permissible Use, Safe Handling and Return of Assets

Employment terms bind personnel to asset handling rules before access.

5.12C5-AM-06argued against and upheld
Asset Classification and Labelling

Classification of information under one scheme by owners matches directly.

5.13C5-AM-06argued against and upheld
Asset Classification and Labelling

Labelling of information according to the classification scheme matches directly.

5.30C5-BCM-02argued against and upheld
Business impact analysis policies and instructions

ICT readiness requires business impact analysis deriving recovery objectives.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk