TheArtOfService
HIPAA Security RuleCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1

HIPAA Security Rule covers 33.5% of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1

66 of the 197 controls in Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for HIPAA Security Rule. 131 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

33.5%
of the target already covered
66
controls evidenced
131
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 your HIPAA Security Rule evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

110 candidate mappings were examined and 1 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair. This pair was additionally re-checked after CSA CCM v4.0.1 was rebuilt from the CAIQ v4.0.1 source on 2026-08-19: its mappings were originally judged when CCM carried no requirement text, a sample of 70 across the 21 CCM pairs found about 80 percent holding cleanly, and the two identified errors were corrected before release.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience8 of 11 evidenced, 3 to do
HRS - Human Resources Security9 of 13 evidenced, 4 to do
IAM - Identity & Access Management10 of 16 evidenced, 6 to do
GRC - Governance, Risk & Compliance5 of 8 evidenced, 3 to do
DCS - Datacenter Security8 of 15 evidenced, 7 to do
SEF - Security Incident Management, E-Discovery & Cloud Forensics4 of 8 evidenced, 4 to do
LOG - Logging & Monitoring5 of 13 evidenced, 8 to do
A&A - Audit & Assurance2 of 6 evidenced, 4 to do
STA - Supply Chain Management, Transparency & Accountability4 of 14 evidenced, 10 to do
UEM - Universal Endpoint Management3 of 14 evidenced, 11 to do
DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management4 of 19 evidenced, 15 to do
CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management3 of 21 evidenced, 18 to do
TVM - Threat & Vulnerability Management1 of 10 evidenced, 9 to do
AIS - Application & Interface Security0 of 7 evidenced, 7 to do
CCC - Change Control & Configuration Management0 of 9 evidenced, 9 to do
IPY - Interoperability & Portability0 of 4 evidenced, 4 to do
IVS - Infrastructure & Virtualization Security0 of 9 evidenced, 9 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

164.308(a)(8)CCM-A&A-01argued against and upheld
Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures

Periodic technical and nontechnical evaluation is the audit and assurance obligation.

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B)CCM-A&A-06argued against and upheld
Remediation

Prioritized treatment plans with leadership acceptance are the corrective action plan.

164.308(a)(7)(i)CCM-BCR-01argued against and upheld
Business Continuity Management Policy and Procedures

The contingency plan standard is the business continuity policy requirement.

164.308(a)(7)(ii)(E)CCM-BCR-02argued against and upheld
Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis

Criticality analysis of applications and data is the business impact analysis.

164.308(a)(7)(ii)(C)CCM-BCR-03argued against and upheld
Business Continuity Strategy

Emergency mode operation sets how critical processes withstand a disruption.

164.308(a)(7)(ii)(B)CCM-BCR-03argued against and upheld
Business Continuity Strategy

The disaster recovery plan sets how operations are restored after disruption.

164.308(a)(7)(ii)(C)CCM-BCR-04argued against and upheld
Business Continuity Planning

Documented emergency mode procedures are the continuity plan content.

164.308(a)(7)(ii)(D)CCM-BCR-06argued against and upheld
Business Continuity Exercises

Periodic testing and revision of contingency plans is the exercise programme.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk