FedRAMP ModerateSOC 2

FedRAMP Moderate covers 60.7% of SOC 2

37 of the 61 controls in SOC 2 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for FedRAMP Moderate. 24 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

60.7%
of the target already covered
37
controls evidenced
24
genuine gaps
32
claims rejected in review

What this leaves you to do

SOC 2 has 61 controls. Holding FedRAMP Moderate already evidences 37 of them, so the work in front of you is 24 controls, not 61, which is 39% of the standard rather than all of it.

That is the whole claim. We do not know your hourly rate, how long a control takes you, or how many people you have, so there is no figure here in dollars or weeks. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.

This number is directional. It says how much of SOC 2 your FedRAMP Moderate evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

135 candidate mappings were examined and 32 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

C - Confidentiality2 of 2 evidenced
CC - Common Criteria (Security)28 of 33 evidenced, 5 to do
A - Availability2 of 3 evidenced, 1 to do
PI - Processing Integrity2 of 5 evidenced, 3 to do
P - Privacy3 of 18 evidenced, 15 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

PE-11SOC2-A1.2argued against and upheld
Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability

Emergency power is an environmental protection supporting availability.

CP-9SOC2-A1.2argued against and upheld
Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability

System backup is the data backup element of availability infrastructure.

CP-4SOC2-A1.3argued against and upheld
Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures

Contingency plan testing tests recovery procedures against recovery objectives.

SC-28SOC2-C1.1argued against and upheld
Confidential information is identified and protected during receipt, processing, storage

Protection of information at rest protects identified confidential information in storage.

MP-6SOC2-C1.2argued against and upheld
Confidential information is disposed of securely

Media sanitisation disposes of confidential information so it cannot be recovered.

PL-4SOC2-CC1.1argued against and upheld
COSO principle 1: Demonstrates commitment to integrity and ethical values

Rules of behaviour set and acknowledge expected conduct for all system users.

AT-3SOC2-CC1.4argued against and upheld
COSO principle 4: Demonstrates commitment to attract and retain competent individuals

Role-based training develops the competence each security role requires.

PS-8SOC2-CC1.5argued against and upheld
COSO principle 5: Holds individuals accountable for internal control responsibilities

The sanctions process holds individuals accountable for failing their security responsibilities.

Claims that did not hold

32 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.

CP-6SOC2-A1.2
Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

CP-2SOC2-A1.2
Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

CP-10SOC2-A1.2
Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

MP-6SOC2-C1.1
Confidential information is identified and protected during receipt, processing, storage

did not survive the adversarial verification pass run by qwen3-235b-a22b-2507 via openrouter. No per-edge rationale was recorded at the time, so the process is stated rather than a reason invented.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

AC-17(2)SOC2-C1.1
Confidential information is identified and protected during receipt, processing, storage

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

IA-12SOC2-CC6.2
Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

IA-12(2)SOC2-CC6.2
Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

IA-12(3)SOC2-CC6.2
Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk