FedRAMP ModerateHIPAA Security Rule

FedRAMP Moderate covers 77.6% of HIPAA Security Rule

52 of the 67 controls in HIPAA Security Rule are already satisfied by evidence you collected for FedRAMP Moderate. 15 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

77.6%
of the target already covered
52
controls evidenced
15
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of HIPAA Security Rule your FedRAMP Moderate evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

111 candidate mappings were examined and 1 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

Administrative27 of 32 evidenced, 5 to do
Technical10 of 12 evidenced, 2 to do
Policies and Procedures4 of 5 evidenced, 1 to do
Physical9 of 12 evidenced, 3 to do
Organizational2 of 6 evidenced, 4 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

RA-3164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A)argued against and upheld
Risk Analysis (Required)

Risk assessment identifies threats, vulnerabilities and impact to the system and its data.

CA-5164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B)argued against and upheld
Risk Management (Required)

The plan of action and milestones records and tracks measures that reduce identified risk.

PS-8164.308(a)(1)(ii)(C)argued against and upheld
Sanction Policy (Required)

The formal sanctions process applies to workforce members who breach security policy.

AU-6164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D)argued against and upheld
Information System Activity Review (Required)

Audit review, analysis and reporting is the regular activity review this specification requires.

PL-1164.308(a)(2)argued against and upheld
Assigned Security Responsibility (Standard)

The policy control requires designating an official to manage security policy and procedures.

AC-2164.308(a)(3)(i)argued against and upheld
Workforce Security (Standard)

Account management authorises appropriate access and removes it when it is not appropriate.

AC-2164.308(a)(3)(ii)(A)argued against and upheld
Authorization and Supervision (Addressable)

Account management defines authorisation, approval and supervision for each account.

PS-3164.308(a)(3)(ii)(B)argued against and upheld
Workforce Clearance Procedure (Addressable)

Personnel screening determines that access is appropriate before it is granted.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk