FedRAMP Moderate covers 98.2% of CMMC 2.0
108 of the 110 controls in CMMC 2.0 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for FedRAMP Moderate. 2 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of CMMC 2.0 your FedRAMP Moderate evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
182 candidate mappings were examined and 1 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Coverage here is near total and that is the correct answer rather than overreach: CMMC 2.0 Level 2 practices are the NIST SP 800-171 requirements, tailored from the same NIST SP 800-53 Moderate catalogue FedRAMP Moderate selects. If you hold a FedRAMP Moderate authorisation, most of CMMC Level 2 is already evidenced. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner, and every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Remote access authorization covers authorized access from outside the boundary.
Account management establishes who is authorized before any access is granted.
Access enforcement limits system access to authorized users and processes.
Pattern hiding displays conceal information on the locked session.
Device lock after inactivity with re-authentication is session lock.
Automatic session termination on defined conditions is the same control.
Monitoring and control of remote access sessions is this practice.
Cryptographic protection of remote access confidentiality and integrity matches directly.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk