FedRAMP Moderate covers 69.8% of AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar
44 of the 63 controls in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar are already satisfied by evidence you collected for FedRAMP Moderate. 19 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
What this leaves you to do
AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 63 controls. Holding FedRAMP Moderate already evidences 44 of them, so the work in front of you is 19 controls, not 63, which is 30% of the standard rather than all of it.
That is the whole claim. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.
In money, using only our numbers. The full report is $299 and names 44 controls of AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar you do not have to implement again, which is $6.80 per control identified. That arithmetic uses our price and our count and assumes nothing about you.
In your hours, using your assumption. We do not know what a control costs you to implement, so pick the column that looks like your organisation. These are your figures, not our claim.
| If a control takes you | 4 hours | 8 hours | 16 hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| the 44 already evidenced are | 176 hours | 352 hours | 704 hours |
| and the 19 remaining are | 76 hours | 152 hours | 304 hours |
Multiply by your own rate. We publish no rate because we have not measured yours, and a number built on an invented rate is the kind of claim this platform exists to argue against.
This number is directional. It says how much of AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar your FedRAMP Moderate evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
108 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk