FedRAMP Moderate covers 83.8% of ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
31 of the 37 controls in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents are already satisfied by evidence you collected for FedRAMP Moderate. 6 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents your FedRAMP Moderate evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
60 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Preventing program execution according to defined policies is the enforcement half.
FedRAMP requires an authorized software list and allowlisting, which is application control.
FedRAMP fixes remediation timeframes by severity, matching the extreme risk patching deadline.
FedRAMP fixes scanning frequencies that surface the application flaws needing patching.
FedRAMP fixes configuration to CIS, USGCB or DISA STIG checklists, which set macro handling.
Checklist based configuration settings disable unneeded browser and document reader features.
Spam protection at entry and exit points with updates is email content filtering.
Routing internal traffic to external networks through authenticated proxies is web content filtering.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk