FedRAMP Moderate covers 55.8% of APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
24 of the 43 controls in APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management are already satisfied by evidence you collected for FedRAMP Moderate. 19 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
What this leaves you to do
APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 43 controls. Holding FedRAMP Moderate already evidences 24 of them, so the work in front of you is 19 controls, not 43, which is 44% of the standard rather than all of it.
That is the whole claim. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.
In money, using only our numbers. The full report is $299 and names 24 controls of APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management you do not have to implement again, which is $12.46 per control identified. That arithmetic uses our price and our count and assumes nothing about you.
In your hours, using your assumption. We do not know what a control costs you to implement, so pick the column that looks like your organisation. These are your figures, not our claim.
| If a control takes you | 4 hours | 8 hours | 16 hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| the 24 already evidenced are | 96 hours | 192 hours | 384 hours |
| and the 19 remaining are | 76 hours | 152 hours | 304 hours |
Multiply by your own rate. We publish no rate because we have not measured yours, and a number built on an invented rate is the kind of claim this platform exists to argue against.
This number is directional. It says how much of APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management your FedRAMP Moderate evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
58 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
FedRAMP fixes annual risk assessment identifying threats, likelihood and harm.
Recovery and reconstitution to a known state within the recovery objective is the return to normal.
External providers must comply with security requirements before reliance is placed on them.
Organizational assessment and approval is required before an external service may be used.
Unsupported components must be replaced or alternative support arranged, which is asset health.
An annually refreshed documented risk assessment covering the whole system matches.
Continuous monitoring with defined metrics provides the systems keeping the risk picture current.
A documented risk assessment is required before the arrangement proceeds.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk