EU AI Act covers 66.7% of NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
48 of the 72 controls in NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) are already satisfied by evidence you collected for EU AI Act. 24 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
What this leaves you to do
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) has 72 controls. Holding EU AI Act already evidences 48 of them, so the work in front of you is 24 controls, not 72, which is 33% of the standard rather than all of it.
That is the whole claim. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.
In money, using only our numbers. The full report is $299 and names 48 controls of NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) you do not have to implement again, which is $6.23 per control identified. That arithmetic uses our price and our count and assumes nothing about you.
In your hours, using your assumption. We do not know what a control costs you to implement, so pick the column that looks like your organisation. These are your figures, not our claim.
| If a control takes you | 4 hours | 8 hours | 16 hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| the 48 already evidenced are | 192 hours | 384 hours | 768 hours |
| and the 24 remaining are | 96 hours | 192 hours | 384 hours |
Multiply by your own rate. We publish no rate because we have not measured yours, and a number built on an invented rate is the kind of claim this platform exists to argue against.
This number is directional. It says how much of NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) your EU AI Act evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
72 candidate mappings were examined and 10 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-20.
Claims that did not hold
10 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk