TheArtOfService
DORACloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1

DORA covers 19.8% of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1

39 of the 197 controls in Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for DORA. 158 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

19.8%
of the target already covered
39
controls evidenced
158
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 your DORA evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

71 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-20, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

SEF - Security Incident Management, E-Discovery & Cloud Forensics6 of 8 evidenced, 2 to do
GRC - Governance, Risk & Compliance5 of 8 evidenced, 3 to do
BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience6 of 11 evidenced, 5 to do
STA - Supply Chain Management, Transparency & Accountability5 of 14 evidenced, 9 to do
A&A - Audit & Assurance2 of 6 evidenced, 4 to do
TVM - Threat & Vulnerability Management3 of 10 evidenced, 7 to do
IPY - Interoperability & Portability1 of 4 evidenced, 3 to do
LOG - Logging & Monitoring3 of 13 evidenced, 10 to do
IVS - Infrastructure & Virtualization Security2 of 9 evidenced, 7 to do
HRS - Human Resources Security2 of 13 evidenced, 11 to do
DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management2 of 19 evidenced, 17 to do
IAM - Identity & Access Management1 of 16 evidenced, 15 to do
CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management1 of 21 evidenced, 20 to do
AIS - Application & Interface Security0 of 7 evidenced, 7 to do
CCC - Change Control & Configuration Management0 of 9 evidenced, 9 to do
DCS - Datacenter Security0 of 15 evidenced, 15 to do
UEM - Universal Endpoint Management0 of 14 evidenced, 14 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

DORA-Art.6CCM-A&A-02argued against and upheld
Independent Assessments

The framework must be audited periodically by staff holding ICT audit competence.

DORA-Art.24CCM-A&A-03argued against and upheld
Risk Based Planning Assessment

Assessment scope and frequency follow a documented risk-based approach.

DORA-Art.11CCM-BCR-01argued against and upheld
Business Continuity Management Policy and Procedures

An ICT business continuity policy must be established, communicated and maintained.

DORA-Art.11CCM-BCR-04argued against and upheld
Business Continuity Planning

Response and recovery plans implementing the continuity policy must be maintained.

DORA-Art.11CCM-BCR-06argued against and upheld
Business Continuity Exercises

Continuity and recovery plans are subject to regular testing that feeds back into them.

DORA-Art.14CCM-BCR-07argued against and upheld
Communication

Crisis communication plans must cover internal staff and external stakeholders during an incident.

DORA-Art.12CCM-BCR-08argued against and upheld
Backup

Backup policies, segregated backup systems and proven restoration are expressly required.

DORA-Art.24CCM-BCR-10argued against and upheld
Response Plan Exercise

A maintained resilience testing programme exercises response arrangements on a reviewed cycle.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk