TheArtOfService
DORAC5 (Germany)

DORA covers 30.6% of C5 (Germany)

37 of the 121 controls in C5 (Germany) are already satisfied by evidence you collected for DORA. 84 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

30.6%
of the target already covered
37
controls evidenced
84
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of C5 (Germany) your DORA evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

67 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-20, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

C5: Security Incident Management4 of 5 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Control and Monitoring of Service Providers and Suppliers4 of 5 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Business Continuity Management3 of 4 evidenced, 1 to do
C5: Organisation of Information Security4 of 7 evidenced, 3 to do
C5: Operations12 of 24 evidenced, 12 to do
C5: Compliance2 of 4 evidenced, 2 to do
C5: Asset Management2 of 6 evidenced, 4 to do
C5: Portability and Interoperability1 of 3 evidenced, 2 to do
C5: Security Policies and Instructions1 of 3 evidenced, 2 to do
C5: Cryptography and Key Management1 of 4 evidenced, 3 to do
C5: Human Resources1 of 6 evidenced, 5 to do
C5: Communication Security1 of 8 evidenced, 7 to do
C5: Identity and Access Management1 of 9 evidenced, 8 to do
C5: Procurement, Development and Modification of Information Systems0 of 10 evidenced, 10 to do
C5: Dealing with Investigation Requests from Government Agencies0 of 4 evidenced, 4 to do
C5: Physical Security0 of 7 evidenced, 7 to do
C5: Product Safety and Security0 of 12 evidenced, 12 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

DORA-Art.8C5-AM-01argued against and upheld
Asset Inventory

All information and ICT assets supporting business functions must be identified and documented.

DORA-Art.8C5-AM-06argued against and upheld
Asset Classification and Labelling

Assets and the functions they support must be classified under the framework.

DORA-Art.5C5-BCM-01argued against and upheld
Top management responsibility

The management body bears ultimate responsibility for ICT risk including continuity arrangements.

DORA-Art.11C5-BCM-03argued against and upheld
Planning business continuity

A documented ICT continuity policy with response and recovery plans must be implemented.

DORA-Art.11C5-BCM-04argued against and upheld
Verification, updating and testing of the business continuity

Continuity and recovery plans are subject to regular testing and review.

DORA-Art.6C5-COM-03argued against and upheld
Internal audits of the information security management system

The framework must be audited periodically by staff holding ICT audit competence.

DORA-Art.5C5-COM-04argued against and upheld
Information on information security performance and management assessment of the ISMS

The management body oversees implementation and is responsible for framework performance.

DORA-Art.10C5-COS-01argued against and upheld
Technical safeguards

Irregular traffic and network performance anomalies must be promptly detected and responded to.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk