CMMC 2.0 covers 75.7% of ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
28 of the 37 controls in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents are already satisfied by evidence you collected for CMMC 2.0. 9 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents your CMMC 2.0 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
88 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Both operate a software execution policy allowing only authorized programs to run.
Both require application flaws identified and corrected promptly, though the 48 hour parameter differs.
Office macros are mobile code, and both restrict which mobile code may execute.
Both require unnecessary features and functions to be disabled on user applications.
Both define and enforce security configuration settings for the products in use.
Both require files arriving from external sources scanned as they are opened.
Email is the entry point where both require malicious code protection.
Both monitor and control communications crossing the external system boundary.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk