Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 covers 37.2% of NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1

71 of the 191 controls in NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 120 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

37.2%
of the target already covered
71
controls evidenced
120
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

What this leaves you to do

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 has 191 controls. Holding Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 already evidences 71 of them, so the work in front of you is 120 controls, not 191, which is 63% of the standard rather than all of it.

That is the whole claim. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.

In money, using only our numbers. The full report is $299 and names 71 controls of NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 you do not have to implement again, which is $4.21 per control identified. That arithmetic uses our price and our count and assumes nothing about you.

In your hours, using your assumption. We do not know what a control costs you to implement, so pick the column that looks like your organisation. These are your figures, not our claim.

If a control takes you4 hours8 hours16 hours
the 71 already evidenced are284 hours568 hours1,136 hours
and the 120 remaining are480 hours960 hours1,920 hours

Multiply by your own rate. We publish no rate because we have not measured yours, and a number built on an invented rate is the kind of claim this platform exists to argue against.

This number is directional. It says how much of NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 your Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

206 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk