Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 covers 37.2% of NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1

71 of the 191 controls in NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 120 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

37.2%

of the target already covered

controls evidenced

120

genuine gaps

claims rejected in review

What this leaves you to do

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 has 191 controls. Holding Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 already evidences 71 of them, so the work in front of you is 120 controls, not 191, which is 63% of the standard rather than all of it.

That is the whole claim. We do not know your hourly rate, how long a control takes you, or how many people you have, so there is no figure here in dollars or weeks. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.

This number is directional. It says how much of NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 your Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

206 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

C-SCRM Family: Personally Identifiable Information Processing and Transparency1 of 1 evidenced

C-SCRM Family: Configuration Management11 of 14 evidenced, 3 to do

C-SCRM Family: Personnel Security3 of 4 evidenced, 1 to do

C-SCRM Family: Identification and Authentication5 of 7 evidenced, 2 to do

C-SCRM Family: Access Control8 of 14 evidenced, 6 to do

C-SCRM Family: Risk Assessment4 of 7 evidenced, 3 to do

C-SCRM Family: Physical and Environmental Protection5 of 9 evidenced, 4 to do

C-SCRM Family: Supply Chain Risk Management7 of 13 evidenced, 6 to do

C-SCRM Family: System and Information Integrity4 of 8 evidenced, 4 to do

C-SCRM Family: Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring3 of 6 evidenced, 3 to do

C-SCRM Family: Media Protection2 of 4 evidenced, 2 to do

C-SCRM Family: Incident Response3 of 9 evidenced, 6 to do

C-SCRM Family: System and Communications Protection4 of 14 evidenced, 10 to do

C-SCRM Family: Planning2 of 7 evidenced, 5 to do

C-SCRM Family: Program Management6 of 30 evidenced, 24 to do

C-SCRM Family: System and Services Acquisition3 of 15 evidenced, 12 to do

C-SCRM Family: Awareness and Training0 of 4 evidenced, 4 to do

C-SCRM Family: Audit and Accountability0 of 9 evidenced, 9 to do

C-SCRM Family: Contingency Planning0 of 8 evidenced, 8 to do

C-SCRM Family: Maintenance0 of 8 evidenced, 8 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

CCM-STA-12AC-1argued against and upheld

Policy and Procedures

Access standards flowed by policy into every supply chain provider agreement.

CCM-UEM-14AC-19argued against and upheld

Access Control for Mobile Devices

Third-party endpoints reaching organisational assets held to a security posture.

CCM-IAM-07AC-2argued against and upheld

Account Management

Access removed or adjusted promptly when any identity changes or engagement ends.

CCM-IAM-06AC-2argued against and upheld

Account Management

Every account grant authorised and recorded regardless of whose staff holds it.

CCM-HRS-10AC-21argued against and upheld

Information Sharing

Confidentiality and non-disclosure terms set the handling conditions for shared detail.

CCM-IVS-06AC-3argued against and upheld

Access Enforcement

Provider and tenant access segregated so one party cannot reach another.

CCM-IAM-16AC-3argued against and upheld

Access Enforcement

Each access to data and functions checked as authorised, not merely authenticated.

CCM-DSP-10AC-4argued against and upheld

Information Flow Enforcement

Data protected on transfer with processing confined to permitted purposes.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk