Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 covers 20% of Australia My Health Records Act 2012
8 of the 40 controls in Australia My Health Records Act 2012 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 32 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of Australia My Health Records Act 2012 your Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
43 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Notifying affected parties of breaches within the timeframes law and regulation set matches directly.
Managing retention, archiving and deletion against legal requirements is the retention obligation.
A working route to request correction, fulfilled as law requires, is the correction obligation.
Disposal by methods leaving data forensically unrecoverable is the destruction obligation.
Periodic security assessments across every supply chain organisation evidence provider oversight.
Binding every supply chain provider to the organisation security, access, privacy and vetting standards matches.
Approved identity and access policies put into effect and reviewed annually is the access policy required.
Approved, leadership sponsored governance policies reviewed annually is the written security policy.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk