CIS Controls v8SOC 2

CIS Controls v8 covers 37.7% of SOC 2

23 of the 61 controls in SOC 2 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for CIS Controls v8. 38 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

37.7%
of the target already covered
23
controls evidenced
38
genuine gaps
47
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of SOC 2 your CIS Controls v8 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

108 candidate mappings were examined and 47 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

C - Confidentiality2 of 2 evidenced
A - Availability2 of 3 evidenced, 1 to do
CC - Common Criteria (Security)16 of 33 evidenced, 17 to do
P - Privacy3 of 18 evidenced, 15 to do
PI - Processing Integrity0 of 5 evidenced, 5 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

CIS-11.3SOC2-A1.2argued against and upheld
Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability

Protecting recovery data ensures backups are usable when availability is threatened.

CIS-11.2SOC2-A1.2argued against and upheld
Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability

Automated backups are the data backup limb of this availability criterion.

CIS-11.4SOC2-A1.2argued against and upheld
Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability

An isolated recovery instance is the recovery infrastructure the criterion names.

CIS-11.5SOC2-A1.3argued against and upheld
Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures

Testing data recovery is precisely the recovery plan testing required.

CIS-3.2SOC2-C1.1argued against and upheld
Confidential information is identified and protected during receipt, processing, storage

Data inventory records where confidential information is received, processed and stored.

CIS-3.11SOC2-C1.1argued against and upheld
Confidential information is identified and protected during receipt, processing, storage

Encryption at rest protects confidential information during storage.

CIS-3.7SOC2-C1.1argued against and upheld
Confidential information is identified and protected during receipt, processing, storage

Data classification scheme is how confidential information gets identified.

CIS-3.4SOC2-C1.2argued against and upheld
Confidential information is disposed of securely

Retention enforcement triggers disposal when confidential information is no longer needed.

Claims that did not hold

47 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.

CIS-11.1SOC2-A1.2
Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

CIS-3.10SOC2-C1.1
Confidential information is identified and protected during receipt, processing, storage

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

CIS-3.3SOC2-C1.1
Confidential information is identified and protected during receipt, processing, storage

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

CIS-16.14SOC2-CC3.2
COSO principle 7: Identifies risks and analyzes to determine how managed

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

CIS-7.5SOC2-CC4.1
COSO principle 16: Selects and develops ongoing and separate evaluations

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

CIS-18.2SOC2-CC4.1
COSO principle 16: Selects and develops ongoing and separate evaluations

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

CIS-7.6SOC2-CC4.1
COSO principle 16: Selects and develops ongoing and separate evaluations

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

CIS-18.5SOC2-CC4.1
COSO principle 16: Selects and develops ongoing and separate evaluations

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk