CIS Controls v8NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3

CIS Controls v8 covers 53.6% of NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3

52 of the 97 controls in NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for CIS Controls v8. 45 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

53.6%
of the target already covered
52
controls evidenced
45
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 your CIS Controls v8 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

129 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

03.16 SA (System and Services Acquisition)3 of 3 evidenced
03.17 SR (Supply Chain Risk Management)3 of 3 evidenced
03.02 AT (Awareness and Training)2 of 2 evidenced
03.06 IR (Incident Response)4 of 5 evidenced, 1 to do
03.14 SI (System and Information Integrity)4 of 5 evidenced, 1 to do
03.05 IA (Identification and Authentication)6 of 8 evidenced, 2 to do
03.11 RA (Risk Assessment)2 of 3 evidenced, 1 to do
03.03 AU (Audit and Accountability)5 of 8 evidenced, 3 to do
03.04 CM (Configuration Management)6 of 10 evidenced, 4 to do
03.01 AC (Access Control)8 of 16 evidenced, 8 to do
03.13 SC (System and Communications Protection)5 of 10 evidenced, 5 to do
03.09 PS (Personnel Security)1 of 2 evidenced, 1 to do
03.08 MP (Media Protection)2 of 7 evidenced, 5 to do
03.12 CA (Security Assessment and Monitoring)1 of 4 evidenced, 3 to do
03.07 MA (Maintenance)0 of 3 evidenced, 3 to do
03.10 PE (Physical Protection)0 of 5 evidenced, 5 to do
03.15 PL (Planning)0 of 3 evidenced, 3 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

CIS-6.203.01.01argued against and upheld
Account Management

A documented process revokes access on termination or role change, covering account removal.

CIS-6.103.01.01argued against and upheld
Account Management

A documented process grants access on hire and on privilege change, covering authorisation of accounts.

CIS-5.103.01.01argued against and upheld
Account Management

A maintained inventory of every account with owner and department is the record account management produces.

CIS-5.303.01.01argued against and upheld
Account Management

Dormant accounts are disabled after a defined period, the account disabling half of the requirement.

CIS-3.303.01.02argued against and upheld
Access Enforcement

Data access control lists enforce approved authorisation at the resource level for sensitive data.

CIS-6.803.01.02argued against and upheld
Access Enforcement

Role-based access control defines and enforces the access rights each role is approved to hold.

CIS-6.703.01.02argued against and upheld
Access Enforcement

Access control is centralised through a directory or identity provider that enforces the approved authorisations.

CIS-13.403.01.03argued against and upheld
Information Flow Enforcement

Traffic filtering between network segments controls the flow of data between parts of the system.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk