C5 (Germany) covers 69.9% of ISO 27002:2022
65 of the 93 controls in ISO 27002:2022 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for C5 (Germany). 28 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of ISO 27002:2022 your C5 (Germany) evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
149 candidate mappings were examined and 1 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
C5 requires policies in a uniform structure stating objectives, scope, roles, execution steps and legal duties, approved and issued.
C5 has top management adopt a security policy setting objectives, target level, core strategy and the security organisation.
C5 issues acceptable use and handling instructions spanning acquisition, classification, secure configuration, patching, installation restrictions, transport and deletion.
C5 obtains a demonstrable commitment to the handling rules before assets are issued and evidences their return when the engagement ends.
C5 classifies and labels assets under one scheme with levels for confidentiality, integrity, availability and authenticity.
C5 classifies and labels assets under one scheme with levels for confidentiality, integrity, availability and authenticity.
C5 issues data transmission policies with measures against interception, manipulation, copying and redirection, scaled by classification.
C5's role and rights concept and access policy cover unique usernames, least privilege, segregation of duties, approvals and periodic review.
Claims that did not hold
1 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.
judged against C5 criterion titles before the framework carried requirement text; does not hold against the real criterion; C5-IDM-07 requires the customer be notified of provider access to unencrypted data within 72 hours; it does not restrict access to information
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk