AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 36.6% of ISO 27001:2022
34 of the 93 controls in ISO 27001:2022 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. 59 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of ISO 27001:2022 your AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
120 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Documented classification scheme with handling rules, owners and legal obligations is the artefact assessors test.
Documented access requirements per resource, action and condition is the logical access control rule set.
Joiner mover leaver driven grant and revocation is the identity life cycle evidence assessors want.
Single federated identity provider centrally governs user life cycle across all accounts.
Secrets vaulting with encryption, rotation and least privilege is direct authentication information handling evidence.
Access rights provisioned and revoked from HR events evidences the full grant to removal cycle.
Continuous removal of unexercised permissions is exactly the review and modify step of access rights.
Curated private repositories with scanning and provenance is the core software supply chain artefact.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk