AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 37.5% of Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)
9 of the 24 controls in Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) are already satisfied by evidence you collected for AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. 15 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
What this leaves you to do
Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) has 24 controls. Holding AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar already evidences 9 of them, so the work in front of you is 15 controls, not 24, which is 63% of the standard rather than all of it.
That is the whole claim. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.
In money, using only our numbers. The full report is $299 and names 9 controls of Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) you do not have to implement again, which is $33.22 per control identified. That arithmetic uses our price and our count and assumes nothing about you.
In your hours, using your assumption. We do not know what a control costs you to implement, so pick the column that looks like your organisation. These are your figures, not our claim.
| If a control takes you | 4 hours | 8 hours | 16 hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| the 9 already evidenced are | 36 hours | 72 hours | 144 hours |
| and the 15 remaining are | 60 hours | 120 hours | 240 hours |
Multiply by your own rate. We publish no rate because we have not measured yours, and a number built on an invented rate is the kind of claim this platform exists to argue against.
This number is directional. It says how much of Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) your AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
29 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk