TheArtOfService
Australia My Health Records Act 2012Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 covers 10.7% of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1

21 of the 197 controls in Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for Australia My Health Records Act 2012. 176 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

10.7%
of the target already covered
21
controls evidenced
176
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 your Australia My Health Records Act 2012 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

63 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management8 of 19 evidenced, 11 to do
IAM - Identity & Access Management5 of 16 evidenced, 11 to do
SEF - Security Incident Management, E-Discovery & Cloud Forensics2 of 8 evidenced, 6 to do
HRS - Human Resources Security3 of 13 evidenced, 10 to do
LOG - Logging & Monitoring2 of 13 evidenced, 11 to do
STA - Supply Chain Management, Transparency & Accountability1 of 14 evidenced, 13 to do
A&A - Audit & Assurance0 of 6 evidenced, 6 to do
AIS - Application & Interface Security0 of 7 evidenced, 7 to do
BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience0 of 11 evidenced, 11 to do
CCC - Change Control & Configuration Management0 of 9 evidenced, 9 to do
CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management0 of 21 evidenced, 21 to do
DCS - Datacenter Security0 of 15 evidenced, 15 to do
GRC - Governance, Risk & Compliance0 of 8 evidenced, 8 to do
IPY - Interoperability & Portability0 of 4 evidenced, 4 to do
IVS - Infrastructure & Virtualization Security0 of 9 evidenced, 9 to do
TVM - Threat & Vulnerability Management0 of 10 evidenced, 10 to do
UEM - Universal Endpoint Management0 of 14 evidenced, 14 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

MYHR-SEC-1CCM-DSP-01argued against and upheld
Security and Privacy Policy and Procedures

Mandates an approved written policy for handling record information as the Rule prescribes.

MYHR-SEC-7CCM-DSP-08argued against and upheld
Data Privacy by Design and Default

Consumer access controls and consent settings are built into the record by design.

MYHR-CUD-3CCM-DSP-10argued against and upheld
Sensitive Data Transfer

Processing is confined to the purposes the Act permits.

MYHR-GOV-5CCM-DSP-11argued against and upheld
Personal Data Access, Reversal, Rectification and Deletion

Correction, retention and destruction obligations give effect to subject requests.

MYHR-CUD-6CCM-DSP-12argued against and upheld
Limitation of Purpose in Personal Data Processing

Prohibited purposes such as employment and insurance underwriting are barred outright.

MYHR-CUD-3CCM-DSP-12argued against and upheld
Limitation of Purpose in Personal Data Processing

Use is limited to permitted My Health Record purposes only.

MYHR-REG-4CCM-DSP-13argued against and upheld
Personal Data Sub-processing

Contracted service providers handling record data must be registered and carry the obligations.

MYHR-GOV-5CCM-DSP-16argued against and upheld
Data Retention and Deletion

Statutory retention and destruction obligations set both floor and ceiling on keeping data.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk