Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)GDPR

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) covers 34.1% of GDPR

14 of the 41 controls in GDPR are already satisfied by evidence you collected for Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR). 27 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

34.1%
of the target already covered
14
controls evidenced
27
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

What this leaves you to do

GDPR has 41 controls. Holding Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) already evidences 14 of them, so the work in front of you is 27 controls, not 41, which is 66% of the standard rather than all of it.

That is the whole claim. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.

In money, using only our numbers. The full report is $299 and names 14 controls of GDPR you do not have to implement again, which is $21.36 per control identified. That arithmetic uses our price and our count and assumes nothing about you.

In your hours, using your assumption. We do not know what a control costs you to implement, so pick the column that looks like your organisation. These are your figures, not our claim.

If a control takes you4 hours8 hours16 hours
the 14 already evidenced are56 hours112 hours224 hours
and the 27 remaining are108 hours216 hours432 hours

Multiply by your own rate. We publish no rate because we have not measured yours, and a number built on an invented rate is the kind of claim this platform exists to argue against.

This number is directional. It says how much of GDPR your Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

33 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-20.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk