ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents covers 15.7% of C5 (Germany)
19 of the 121 controls in C5 (Germany) are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. 102 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of C5 (Germany) your ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
59 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Business continuity and disaster recovery plans covering a complete loss of computing capability are the documented planning required
Those plans are required to be tested, which is the verification this criterion requires
Network intrusion detection using signatures and heuristics to identify anomalous traffic is the detection of irregular traffic required
Segmentation and segregation denying traffic between systems unless required is the zoning and per service justification required
Denying direct internet connectivity and forcing traffic through a content checking proxy is the perimeter gateway required
Network segmentation and segregation denying traffic between computers unless required is the traffic separation this criterion requires
Pre employment checks as part of personnel management are the trustworthiness verification required
User education on applicable threats, reporting and the consequences of poor practice is the awareness programme required
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk