APRA CPS 220 Risk Management covers 5.1% of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
10 of the 197 controls in Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for APRA CPS 220 Risk Management. 187 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 your APRA CPS 220 Risk Management evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
38 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Comprehensive review must be by operationally independent, appropriately trained and competent persons.
Internal or external audit reviews framework compliance and effectiveness at least annually.
Review scope is driven by size, business mix, complexity, change and external environment.
Prescribes the minimum assessment content and conclusions each framework review must produce.
Defines the triennial review cycle, the assessors and the re-examination of the framework.
Every deviation must carry documented cause and the remedial steps taken or proposed.
Last revision date, next review date and named owner tracked for every policy.
Framework must include the approved policies and procedures governing material risk.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk