APPI covers 26.2% of SOC 2
16 of the 61 controls in SOC 2 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for APPI. 45 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of SOC 2 your APPI evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
28 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Article 32 requires the business name, purposes, request procedure and complaint contact be made accessible.
Article 21 requires notice or public announcement of the purpose of use after acquisition.
Article 27 requires consent for third party provision and makes prescribed matters known on the opt out route.
Article 20 prohibits acquisition by deceptive or wrongful means.
Article 20 requires prior consent before acquiring special care required personal information.
Article 18 restricts handling to the scope necessary for the specified purpose.
Article 17 fixes the purpose and limits changes to a reasonably related scope.
Article 22 requires deletion without delay once personal data is no longer needed.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk