APPI covers 64.4% of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System
38 of the 59 controls in APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System are already satisfied by evidence you collected for APPI. 21 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
What this leaves you to do
APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System has 59 controls. Holding APPI already evidences 38 of them, so the work in front of you is 21 controls, not 59, which is 36% of the standard rather than all of it.
That is the whole claim. We do not know your hourly rate, how long a control takes you, or how many people you have, so there is no figure here in dollars or weeks. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.
This number is directional. It says how much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System your APPI evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
45 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-20, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Data may not be used by a method that may encourage or induce an unlawful or unjust act.
Business identity, purposes, request procedure and complaint contact must be accessible.
The purpose of use must be notified or publicly announced after acquisition.
Data may not be acquired by deceptive or otherwise wrongful means.
Handling beyond the specified purpose requires the person prior consent.
A changed purpose must remain reasonably related to the purpose before the change.
Business identity and the handling of retained data must be publicly accountable.
The person may demand cessation of use, erasure or cessation of third party provision.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk