TheArtOfService
APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) SystemSOC 2

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System covers 18% of SOC 2

11 of the 61 controls in SOC 2 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System. 50 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

18%
of the target already covered
11
controls evidenced
50
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of SOC 2 your APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

46 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

P - Privacy11 of 18 evidenced, 7 to do
A - Availability0 of 3 evidenced, 3 to do
C - Confidentiality0 of 2 evidenced, 2 to do
CC - Common Criteria (Security)0 of 33 evidenced, 33 to do
PI - Processing Integrity0 of 5 evidenced, 5 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

Program Requirements, Notice, question 4SOC2-P1.1argued against and upheld
Privacy notice provides clear notice about privacy practices

Notifying individuals of third party sharing is required notice content under both.

Program Requirements, Notice, question 3SOC2-P1.1argued against and upheld
Privacy notice provides clear notice about privacy practices

Stating collection purposes at collection evidences required notice content.

Program Requirements, Notice, question 2SOC2-P1.1argued against and upheld
Privacy notice provides clear notice about privacy practices

Notice given at the time of collection is direct evidence of notice to data subjects.

Program Requirements, Notice, question 1SOC2-P1.1argued against and upheld
Privacy notice provides clear notice about privacy practices

Published accessible statements of privacy practices are the privacy notice this criterion tests.

Program Requirements, Choice, question 17SOC2-P2.1argued against and upheld
Consent is obtained for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information

Requiring choices be clear and conspicuous evidences the communication quality tested here.

Program Requirements, Choice, question 16SOC2-P2.1argued against and upheld
Consent is obtained for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information

A mechanism for choice over disclosure satisfies the disclosure limb of this criterion.

Program Requirements, Choice, question 15SOC2-P2.1argued against and upheld
Consent is obtained for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information

A mechanism for choice over use directly satisfies the use limb of this criterion.

Program Requirements, Choice, question 14SOC2-P2.1argued against and upheld
Consent is obtained for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information

A mechanism for choice over collection is the consent evidence this criterion needs.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk