APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System covers 26.9% of ISO 27701:2019
29 of the 108 controls in ISO 27701:2019 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System. 79 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
What this leaves you to do
ISO 27701:2019 has 108 controls. Holding APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System already evidences 29 of them, so the work in front of you is 79 controls, not 108, which is 73% of the standard rather than all of it.
That is the whole claim. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.
In money, using only our numbers. The full report is $299 and names 29 controls of ISO 27701:2019 you do not have to implement again, which is $10.31 per control identified. That arithmetic uses our price and our count and assumes nothing about you.
In your hours, using your assumption. We do not know what a control costs you to implement, so pick the column that looks like your organisation. These are your figures, not our claim.
| If a control takes you | 4 hours | 8 hours | 16 hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| the 29 already evidenced are | 116 hours | 232 hours | 464 hours |
| and the 79 remaining are | 316 hours | 632 hours | 1,264 hours |
Multiply by your own rate. We publish no rate because we have not measured yours, and a number built on an invented rate is the kind of claim this platform exists to argue against.
This number is directional. It says how much of ISO 27701:2019 your APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
62 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-20.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk