APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System covers 69.2% of Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)
9 of the 13 controls in Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) are already satisfied by evidence you collected for APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System. 4 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
What this leaves you to do
Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) has 13 controls. Holding APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System already evidences 9 of them, so the work in front of you is 4 controls, not 13, which is 31% of the standard rather than all of it.
That is the whole claim. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.
In money, using only our numbers. The full report is $299 and names 9 controls of Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) you do not have to implement again, which is $33.22 per control identified. That arithmetic uses our price and our count and assumes nothing about you.
In your hours, using your assumption. We do not know what a control costs you to implement, so pick the column that looks like your organisation. These are your figures, not our claim.
| If a control takes you | 4 hours | 8 hours | 16 hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| the 9 already evidenced are | 36 hours | 72 hours | 144 hours |
| and the 4 remaining are | 16 hours | 32 hours | 64 hours |
Multiply by your own rate. We publish no rate because we have not measured yours, and a number built on an invented rate is the kind of claim this platform exists to argue against.
This number is directional. It says how much of Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) your APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
39 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Requires maintained internal policies and implementing arrangements that ensure compliance with the privacy principles.
Requires published clear and easily accessible statements of the practices governing personal information held.
Requires steps verifying information is up to date, accurate and complete for the purposes of use.
Requires personal information to be maintained accurate, complete and up to date for purposes of use.
Requires the enumerated specific safeguards to be implemented proportionally to risk.
Requires safeguards demonstrably proportional to harm, sensitivity and context, the reasonable steps test.
Requires physical, technical and administrative safeguards against loss, unauthorised access, use and disclosure.
Requires access to be given within a reasonable timeframe in an understandable form.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk