ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0)UK Cyber Essentials

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) covers 50% of UK Cyber Essentials

18 of the 36 controls in UK Cyber Essentials are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0). 18 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

50%
of the target already covered
18
controls evidenced
18
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of UK Cyber Essentials your ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

37 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

User Access Control7 of 8 evidenced, 1 to do
Firewalls4 of 7 evidenced, 3 to do
Secure Configuration5 of 9 evidenced, 4 to do
Security Update Management2 of 5 evidenced, 3 to do
Malware Protection0 of 4 evidenced, 4 to do
Scope0 of 3 evidenced, 3 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

mesure 6CE-AC.1argued against and upheld
User Account Approval Process

Joiner procedure creates access rights in step with user status, the account creation control.

mesure 8CE-AC.2argued against and upheld
Authenticate Users Before Granting Access

Nominative account per person is exactly unique credential before access.

mesure 6CE-AC.3argued against and upheld
Remove or Disable Accounts When No Longer Required

Leaver and role change procedures withdraw and adjust rights as required.

mesure 9CE-AC.4argued against and upheld
Privileged Account Approval and Tracking

Rights on sensitive resources granted according to need is controlled privilege granting.

mesure 5CE-AC.4argued against and upheld
Privileged Account Approval and Tracking

Exhaustive up to date inventory of privileged accounts is the tracking requirement.

mesure 27CE-AC.5argued against and upheld
Separate Admin Accounts for Administrative Activities

Internet prohibited from administration workstations stops admin accounts browsing and reading mail.

mesure 8CE-AC.5argued against and upheld
Separate Admin Accounts for Administrative Activities

User roles kept separate from administrator roles, administration not from ordinary accounts.

mesure 9CE-AC.6argued against and upheld
Periodic Review of Privileged Access

Rights reviewed so access remains limited to those who require it.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk