ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0)SOC 2

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) covers 19.7% of SOC 2

12 of the 61 controls in SOC 2 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0). 49 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

19.7%
of the target already covered
12
controls evidenced
49
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of SOC 2 your ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

38 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

C - Confidentiality1 of 2 evidenced, 1 to do
A - Availability1 of 3 evidenced, 2 to do
CC - Common Criteria (Security)10 of 33 evidenced, 23 to do
P - Privacy0 of 18 evidenced, 18 to do
PI - Processing Integrity0 of 5 evidenced, 5 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

mesure 37SOC2-A1.3argued against and upheld
Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures

Verifying that restoration works is testing of recovery procedures.

mesure 4SOC2-C1.1argued against and upheld
Confidential information is identified and protected during receipt, processing, storage

Identifying the most sensitive information and servers is identification of confidential information.

mesure 38SOC2-CC4.1argued against and upheld
COSO principle 16: Selects and develops ongoing and separate evaluations

Regular security audits are the separate evaluations of control operation this criterion requires.

mesure 13SOC2-CC6.1argued against and upheld
Implements logical access security software, infrastructure and architectures over protected information assets

Strong authentication for privileged and external access is core logical access security.

mesure 9SOC2-CC6.1argued against and upheld
Implements logical access security software, infrastructure and architectures over protected information assets

Rights on sensitive resources granted by need and reviewed is the logical access control itself.

mesure 8SOC2-CC6.1argued against and upheld
Implements logical access security software, infrastructure and architectures over protected information assets

Nominative accounts with user and administrator roles separated underpin logical access architecture.

mesure 6SOC2-CC6.2argued against and upheld
Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established

Joiner, leaver and role change procedures register, adjust and withdraw access with user status.

mesure 5SOC2-CC6.2argued against and upheld
Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established

A maintained inventory of privileged accounts evidences authorisation before privileged access.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk